What we are looking for, and who can apply
Each city’s challenge is complex and will require many different solutions working together to achieve the city’s ambitions. Therefore, we are seeking a variety of proposals that can contribute to solving the problem – we don’t expect a single organization to overcome every barrier. Finalists will work with city stakeholders to fine-tune proposals, adapt to the city context, and form relationships to create a team of complementary partners in each city. The cities and partner organizations will review applications using these criteria:
1. Impact and innovation – does this solution have the potential to achieve the desired impact?
1.1 How is the solution relevant to the challenge as defined by the city? Does the applicant respond to what the city has identified to be the problem?
1.2 Will this solution reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
1.3 Will this solution promote additional socio-economic benefits for the city? How will the community be engaged, including disadvantaged groups or others referenced in the city challenge brief?
1.4 Is it new or different from what’s already on the market?
2. Concept viability – does the applicant present a robust concept that is ready to be demonstrated in a real-world environment?
2.1 Is it technically feasible and viable within the timescales of the challenge and the system demonstrator?
2.2 Does the applicant have a feasible business model within the context of the system demonstrator?
2.3 Is the applicant considering user and customer engagement? Will potential solutions be affordable to the end user?
3. Collaboration potential – is the applicant well-suited to join a team and will engagement with the city support their vision?
3.1 Does the applicant indicate willingness to work with new partners? Is the applicant seeking complementary skills or expertise to achieve their goals?
3.2 Is the applicant able to integrate their solution with others?
3.3 How does the applicant envision collaborating with the city?
4. Capability – does the applicant have the track record to deliver?
4.1 What is the applicant’s relevant experience and expertise?
Finalists will form teams in spring 2022, and will submit proposals in May 2022 outlining how funding for planning for system demonstration should be used.
Proposals will be reviewed and scored by an expert advisory panel, the cities and the Climate Smart Cities Challenge partners.
They will review team proposals and select the winning teams in May 2022 using these criteria:
Impact and innovation - does this team’s proposal have the potential to achieve the desired impact?
a. How is the team’s proposal relevant to the challenge as defined by the city? Does the applicant respond to what the city has identified to be the problem?
b. Will this team’s proposal reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
c. Will this team’s proposal promote additional socio-economic benefits for the city? How will the community be engaged, including disadvantaged groups or others referenced in the city challenge brief?
d. Is it new or different from what’s already on the market?
Concept viability - does the team present a clear concept?
a. Concept viability – does the team present a clear concept?
b. Is it technically feasible and viable within the timescales of the challenge and the system demonstrator?
c. Does the team have a feasible business model within the context of the system demonstrator?
d. Is the team considering user and customer engagement? Will potential products, models or solutions be affordable to the end user?
Collaboration potential - does the team present a suitable vision to collaborate and create a viable system demonstration?
a. Is the team able to integrate their products, models or solutions with others?
b. How does the team envision collaborating with the city?
c. Does the team have resources to bear, in terms of funding or potential additional partners or investors?
Capability - does the team have the track record to deliver? What is the team’s relevant experience and expertise?
a. What is the team’s relevant experience and expertise?
b. Does the team lead have the relevant capacity?